Mole mapping is a technique whereby a
person's moles (naevi) are catalogued or
mapped. The images created can then
be used as part of a person's skin
cancer surveillance program.
Mole mapping is a technique whereby a person's moles (naevi) are catalogued or 'mapped'. The images created can then be used as part of a person's skin cancer surveillance program.
Please note that the best way to assess whether moles need to be mapped, is a complete assessment of all your moles using dermoscopy. If all of your moles have a typical regular and benign pattern on dermoscopy then more detailed mapping may not be required.
There are two main types of mole mapping; conventional photographic imaging and digital dermoscopic imaging.
A series of standardised photographic images of body regions are taken to generate a complete map of the person's skin. It is recommended, for accuracy and standardisation, that the images are taken by qualified medical photographers. The images can be printed on photographic paper, or stored on a computer or a CD-ROM.
Advantages
The images are relatively quick to take
Self surveillance can be done at home
They are portable and easy to store and to view
New moles can be easily detected
They can easily be re-printed if damaged or misplaced
Disdvantages
Can be difficult to detect a change in a mole
Not as detailed as dermoscopic imaging
A partner is required to examine moles on the back
Dermoscopic images allow a more detailed image of the mole to be recorded and stored. The digital devices standardise images for magnification and illumination and can record accurately the location of the moles.
Advantages
The most detailed image of a mole is recorded
Changes in the mole can be seen before they are visible with the naked eye
Earlier detection of melanoma may be possible
Computer software can help to detect new or changing naevi
Disdvantages
It takes time and you need to visit your specialist
The digital systems are expensive and bulky
Follow up with the same digital system is required
Both types have pros and cons and sometimes a combination of the two is recommended.
There is no consensus opinion about the recommended frequency for self surveillance of your moles. In general, for high risk individuals self surveillance should be undertaken at least 3-monthly or preferably monthly. There is no advantage to more frequent routine self surveillance. For people with few risk factors for melanoma a less frequent program of self surveillance could be adopted.
Most digital dermoscopic systems have integrated computer software which can give a risk analysis of how suspicious a mole is. However, independent published research has repeatedly shown limitations in the diagnostic ability of these systems. Therefore these systems should only be used for cataloguing moles and should not be used for diagnosis. The interpretation of any changes seen should only be performed by your specialist.
For more details on Mole Mapping in London by Dr Jonathan Bowling, please visit www.MyDermatologist.co.uk